SUPERANNUATION: Learn the rules around lending SMSF funds to related parties.
SUPERANNUATION: Learn the rules around lending SMSF funds to related parties. iStock

SMSF advisers are missing the rub on fund lending

THERE are a significant number of professionals giving out some seriously wrong advice on related-party lending.

Some professionals believe that a self-managed superannuation fund can lend up to five per cent of the value of its assets to fund members or the members' relatives.

Loans to members or their relatives are prohibited by the superannuation law and you can get into trouble with the tax office for going down this path.

So why are professionals getting this wrong?

The reason they are misinterpreting the law is because the superannuation law does allow lending of up to five per cent to a "related party” of an SMSF. The law is referred to as "in-house asset” and is covered by section 71 of the superannuation law. Section 71 appears under Part 8 of the superannuation law.

Now I prefer to write in plain English and I don't normally quote sections of legislations when I write, but bear with me and you will soon understand why I need to do so in this article.

Another area of the superannuation law prohibits a trustee of an SMSF from lending or giving financial assistance to members and relatives. This law appears at section 65 of the superannuation law.

What members of SMSF and professionals do not realise is that if they read on to subsection 65(7) of the superannuation law, they will see that it states "nothing in Part 8 limits the operation of this section”.

Essentially this means that section 65 overrides section 71 which is in part 8 of the superannuation law. This means that SMSFs can never lend to their members or members' relatives, not even the five per cent in-house asset limit, regardless of what is allowed under section 71. So if a professional is unaware of subsection 65(7), they could easily conclude that as a related party, members could borrow money from their SMSF.

How can you lend to others?

Now you may want to know whether an SMSF can lend to a related party who is not a member or a relative of a member of an SMSF. The good news is it can.

An SMSF can lend up to five per cent of the total value of its assets to a related entity such as a related company or a related unit trust. It can also lend an unlimited amount to a member's cousin or their former spouse, who are not members of their SMSF, because they are not considered related parties.

The reason an SMSF can lend to a cousin or a former spouse is because the definition of a "relative” under the general definition, which is in section 10 of the superannuation law, does not include a cousin and former spouse as a relative of a member of an SMSF.

However, just to keep us on our toes, the definition of a relative under section 17A does include a cousin and a former spouse.

The section 17A definition covers the legal structure of an SMSF. It determines which individuals can be in an SMSF together. The section 10 definition, on the other hand, covers investment transactions involving related parties.

So if your cousin or your former spouse is not a member of your SMSF, then you can lend to them. But if they are members of your SMSF, then your SMSF cannot lend to them, not even the five per cent in-house asset limit.

More knowledge is worthwhile

The superannuation law can be complex as it has various twists. The fact that professionals can get it wrong confirms to me just how complex it can be.

If you get advice that seems too good to be true, get a second opinion.

Having a working knowledge of the law can be immensely helpful in spotting advice that is not up to the mark.

Monica Rule is an SMSF Specialist and author of The Self Managed Super Handbook - Superannuation Law for SMSFs in plain English www.monicarule.com.au.


Group guide: Wide Bay

Group guide: Wide Bay

There's some amazing groups and clubs to join within your community.

Group guide: Northern NSW

Group guide: Northern NSW

There's some amazing groups and clubs to join within your community.

Woman’s $2.80 bus fare led to $886 fine

Woman’s $2.80 bus fare led to $886 fine

Bus passenger who bought a $2.80 fare hit with $886 fine